Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:58:03 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost@cordula.ws> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot Specs - And some sanity Message-ID: <201206150958.q5F9w3N9023951@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Fri, 15 Jun 2012 02:23:29 %2B0200." <CADGWnjU3qkSKGWDUjGwroXXLd_=auWvmfWKy%2B8kqzj5r2oGmeg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Cordula, Good points you made. The sooner it's blocked the easier to block. *BSD, + *Linux, Solaris etc people could start contacting their local anti monopoly / anti free trade, government departments to give them time to look into the issues. If eg EU commision found it a monopolist conspiracy, & imposed swingeing fines like on Microsoft last time, that could persuade Asian mainboard manufacturers not to monopolise with Microsoft. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206150958.q5F9w3N9023951>