Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:57:33 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Kalle =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F8ller?= <freebsd-questions@k-moeller.dk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap vs CSup Message-ID: <p06240800c5e8c460e6a6@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com> References: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 7:39 PM +0100 3/19/09, Kalle M=F8ller wrote: >Hi > >I've been digging around, but I can't find a clear answer, which of those >two is the "correct" to use. Hence I don't use one now, so if I'm going to >learn one, I would prefer it to be the right one. That's a reasonable question to ask. Unfortunately, the answer is "it depends on what you want"... For my use (as more of a developer), I go with csup or cvsup for most of my machines. But on the slower machines that I have, portsnap might be a better choice. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn =3D gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06240800c5e8c460e6a6>