Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 07:56:58 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> To: pav@freebsd.org Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports Message-ID: <46558B9A.6000602@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <46558B2A.5020806@math.missouri.edu> References: <465291FB.4010901@math.missouri.edu> <20070522071941.GB59910@xor.obsecurity.org> <4652FFB4.8060107@math.missouri.edu> <1179846295.52353.27.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4653349D.7080608@math.missouri.edu> <46533D66.1070305@math.missouri.edu> <1179868612.83498.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <1179869940.83498.9.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070522165525.S52261@math.missouri.edu> <1179871899.83498.10.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070522172627.A52261@math.missouri.edu> <465398E0.40404@math.missouri.edu> <1179907804.60308.1.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4654E491.5000700@math.missouri.edu> <1179995317.66903.17.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <46558678.3020704@math.missouri.edu> <1180010691.66903.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <46558B2A.5020806@math.missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 24. 05. 2007 v 07:35 -0500: >>> Pav Lucistnik wrote: >>>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500: >>>> >>>>> I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more >>>>> in bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is >>>>> really equivalent to the patch enclosed here. >>>>> >>>>> Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the rather complicated >>>>> construction which I am proposing to replace? >>>> I don't know, we'd have to ask Joe Marcus. Here is the revision in >>>> question: >>>> >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk.diff?r1=1.22;r2=1.23 >>>> >>>> >>>> You're basically reverting that revision. Perhaps our make(1) wasn't >>>> smart enough those four years ago, I don't know. >>> I'm not really reverting that revision. As it was prior to that >>> revision, I can see it not working under many circumstances. Namely, >>> if ${component} appears more than once in ${_USE_GNOME} - something >>> that will happen frequently - the test will not work. >>> >>> My revision seems the obvious way to do it to me, but I can see that >>> if someone was working with what Joe was working with, that one could >>> be lead to think up his revision. I know that I myself have missed >>> the obvious in many circumstance. >> >> Please send me the patch again, as an attachment, I'll give it some >> workout :) >> > > Here it is. And one more thing - I found the same construction in bsd.python.mk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46558B9A.6000602>