From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 8 07:59:20 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA17383 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 07:59:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA17375 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 07:59:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA24848; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 17:00:15 +0100 Message-Id: <199601081600.RAA24848@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Subject: Re: memory etcx To: shovey@buffnet.net (steve hovey) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 1996 17:00:14 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "steve hovey" at Jan 8, 96 09:03:42 am From: Christoph Kukulies Reply-To: Christoph Kukulies X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > > > Im having a hell of a time finding my system bottleneck. > > What is the best way to check that my system sees all 96mb of memory? Stock FreeBSD will only see 64MB maximum. It's required to build a new kernel with options "MAXMEM=96M" in your case. > > if I do systat -vmstat what I see is rather confusing. > (I have 2.0.5R by the way) > > Also, my uptimes are getting there and Im at a loss to figure out whats > doing it. Any good plans of attack? > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Steve Hovey -- shovey@buffnet.net > root@buffnet.net > > --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de