From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 05:46:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8A716A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 05:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from MXR-4.estpak.ee (mta3.mail.neti.ee [194.126.101.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E3B43D1F for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 05:46:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from localhost (reha4 [127.0.0.1]) by MXR-4.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1601621EFC; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:45:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from MXR-4.estpak.ee ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (reha4 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19244-01; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:45:40 +0200 (EET) Received: from kevad.internal (80-235-40-20-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.40.20]) by MXR-4.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B8C21ECF; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:45:31 +0200 (EET) Received: from kevad.internal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kevad.internal (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBADkMn9002618; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:46:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo@kevad.internal) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by kevad.internal (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBADkL27002617; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:46:21 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:46:19 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Jeff Roberson Message-ID: <20031210134619.GA2552@kevad.internal> References: <20031207082612.D4201-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031207082612.D4201-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at neti.ee cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE and current. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:46:38 -0000 On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 08:30:13AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > The plan is to leave ULE as the default until we get to 5.3 at which point > we will decide whether or not it is production quality. The most > untest workload that I know of is on massive multiuser systems with lots > of interactive tasks. If anyone has such a system, I would love to hear > of feedback while running ULE. For anyone else, if your workload is > either improved or hindered, I'd appreciate a mail with the a description > of your workload, your hardware, behavior with ULE, and behavior with > 4BSD. I have one noticeable annoyance with ULE while setiathome is running. It takes sometimes a second or two more to open mailbox (maildir format) with several hundreds of messages. If setiathome is stopped it will not happen, the mailbox will be opened instantly. The system is dual PIII-500, sources and kernel from Nov 27, two setiathome processes running at nice 20. -- Vallo Kallaste