From owner-cvs-etc Mon Oct 27 10:05:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA10872 for cvs-etc-outgoing; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 10:05:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-etc) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA10703; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 10:03:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA00982; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:03:06 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:03:01 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: Tom cc: Nate Williams , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc master.passwd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Tom wrote: > I agree with that. Apache should be running as some other user. No. If you ever run Apache, you'll understand. Many CGI scripts and other things for WWW already assume nobody. BTW, I even see no reason to do it, we need just single nobody only to share among all programs which needs it, not bunch of no-user ids each per particular program. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/