Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:23:33 -0500
From:      Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net>
To:        Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: autoconf 2.50
Message-ID:  <20011213172333.A96484@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
In-Reply-To: <19794459125.20011214005824@serebryakov.spb.ru>; from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru on Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 12:58:24AM %2B0300
References:  <19794459125.20011214005824@serebryakov.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 12:58:24AM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>Hello, ports! How are you?
>
> deve/autoconf port has 2.13-XXX version :(
> And many programs want autoconf-2.50 already.
> For example, I want to update icewm port to 1.0.9-2 version, and
> icewm 1.0.9 needs autoconf-2.50.
>
> System has two identical ports now -- autoconf213 and autoconf. WHY?

They are not identical. Same for automake.

Make ports will not build using the newer versions. And don't say they
should be updated/fixed ... to update KDE, for example, to use the newer
versions would require a massive overhaul to an already too-complex build
system.


-- 
Alan Eldridge
Just another $LANGUAGE hacker.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011213172333.A96484>