From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  6 03:44:30 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93128CE2
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 May 2015 03:44:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B24316BC
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 May 2015 03:44:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgyo15 with SMTP id o15so203554769wgy.2
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 05 May 2015 20:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=PPX999Cy8YxA+kri+WNvSaExidbZn2rX9T3Nun+wqcs=;
 b=CIAWu9RNfjjXRMC69x+xfKDbydJpPRRbBOS0cvPVAsEbaH9wAxDg83Ur4S5iYXYTcp
 k5CV7xcK/7Ao6o9KYChhJVye/1gBC8GrPD/lB50kNmGbcGJBwjN+1yIJdIP4FKxvqvWy
 4ycpwDxyFcJTX/JkEcBe3qPtM9JP40miMfXswE0UMVFYBW3m4ZRX0VqE0fh5aiiFoQWo
 uC50MBXKQJjP6gzWve1pG2vkC7a/urDpvu70hdESdHXMmR7HNXIDB15y2hu0HJhkn6bm
 +CHK2Hy3pBb47iQxX58jCAdK0fnF+Q3vKFh5Y4lkFOZZXbjBIOiMqmUJStl4ALVYy+Og
 kPKw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.95.132 with SMTP id dk4mr10953550wjb.88.1430883868575;
 Tue, 05 May 2015 20:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.209.203 with HTTP; Tue, 5 May 2015 20:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1505051211210.15202@z.fncre.vasb>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1505051211210.15202@z.fncre.vasb>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 11:44:28 +0800
Message-ID: <CANOOb2WvcdPA_HfFhVvOKZt1QSn=UmLsED5NxDHrCL5Vr+jNaA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: www/iojs 2.0.0 is there
From: Daniel Lin <linpct@gmail.com>
To: Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 03:44:30 -0000

Hello, Marcin,

    Thanks, but I think iojs updates very often, it would keep many version
on ports.

    I would also ask others and listen to other opinion.

    Thanks.

2015-05-05 20:18 GMT+08:00 Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info>:

> Unfortunately, similarly to iojs 1.0.4 -> 1.1.0
> NODE_MODULE_VERSION has been bumped (from 43 to 44)
> to indicate potential v8 API breakage.
>
> Maybe we should keep node 1.8.1 around for those who
> depend on those binary modules.
>
> I also keep node 1.0.4 in my private repository for
> that reason https://github.com/saper/ports-exp/tree/master/www/iojs42
>
> ~Marcin
>



-- 
Daniel Lin (pct)