From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 10 16:54:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail8.nc.rr.com (fe8.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C3637B405; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:54:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from there ([66.57.85.154]) by mail8.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.687.68); Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:57:22 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Brian T.Schellenberger To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, will@FreeBSD.ORG, greid@ukug.uk.freebsd.org Subject: Re: CUPS dependency in KDE packages Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:57:21 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <040735219030a12FE7@mail7.nc.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <040735219030a12FE7@mail7.nc.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <03e262257230a12FE8@mail8.nc.rr.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wednesday 09 January 2002 10:19 pm, Brian T.Schellenberger wrote: > I don't like the way that KDE drags in CUPS. > > I don't know anything about CUPS except that I can't print if it's enabled, > and frankly I don't care to have to learn anything about CUPS just to use > KDE. > > (If I try to print with CUPS enabled as a regular user it claims that the > queue can't be found. Works as root, though as it turns out that's > probably not a permissions problem but rather the fact that my root has a > different path set up.) > > I just did a pkg_delete -f of CUPS and now I can print again (yay!), but > it's a pretty ugly thing to have to do and it took me quite a while to > figure out that that was the solution to my problem. > > Could this be made into one of those optional --WITH things? > > Is there any way to make things like that optional when installing from > packages? > > This may be more of a generalized problem with the whole ports/packages > design, and I understand that it's a little complex, but I hope that a > solution will be thought of. Actually, in giving the matter some more thought perhaps the best solution would be if the CUPS dependency could be left in the KDE2 packages but the CUPS port could be set up such that if CUPS has never been configured but lpr has (/etc/printcap has been touched, maybe?), then CUPS would just "pass through" the commands to their /usr/bin equivalents. This might not be difficult for my situation, though--I was initially installing these as packages off the 4.4 install disks (my hard drive went bad so I had to re-stage my system). Things seemed to be ok when I installed from ports rather than packages, so perhaps the ports have these smarts built in already. -- Brian T. Schellenberger . . . . . . . bts@wnt.sas.com (work) Brian, the man from Babble-On . . . . bts@babbleon.org (personal) http://www.babbleon.org -------> Free Dmitry Sklyarov! (let him go home) <----------- http://www.eff.org http://www.programming-freedom.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message