From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 21 11:35:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BC916A6A4 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: from mail.extracktor.com (www.nexlabs.com [210.193.32.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF4C13C481 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: (qmail 37170 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2006 08:45:00 -0000 Received: from 104.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg (HELO ?192.168.1.124?) (jhfoo@nexlabs.com@210.193.15.104) by www.nexlabs.com with SMTP; 21 Dec 2006 08:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <458A4A63.6030407@extracktor.com> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:48:35 +0800 From: Foo JH User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45892886.3040304@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <45892886.3040304@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 'NID not found' on SATA hdd (FBSD 6.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:35:14 -0000 Hi all, I'm using the 6.1 release of FreeBSD. Just installed the OS on a 160GB SATA harddisk. While installing a port halfway I get this series of error messages: ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA48 retrying (1 retry left) LBA=283609215 ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA48 retrying (0 retries left) LBA=283609215 ad4: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 status=51 error=10 LBA=283609215 Running through the mailing list I notice that something similar happened: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2004-December/010192.html However that was on the 5.x series, and the source codes have changed since (so I can't do the patch as well). Does anyone recognise this problem? Is it fixable? Thanks.