Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 09:57:32 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bizarre behavior with vx0 driver? Message-ID: <199810021657.JAA00442@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Oct 1998 10:23:51 CDT." <Pine.OSF.4.02.9810020958260.17547-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Anyone using the vx0 driver and seeing behavior like this? > This is on a -current box CVSup'd and rebuilt yesterday. This is classic "interrupts not happening, running on watchdog" behaviour. If you're -current, it means you can't use the xl driver I guess. Dump the card; it sucks and so does our driver for it. > steve[~]$ ping 152.136.53.1 > PING 152.136.53.1 (152.136.53.1): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=766.484 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=750.168 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=740.206 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=730.236 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=720.217 ms > ... > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=72 ttl=128 time=40.358 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=73 ttl=128 time=30.149 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=74 ttl=128 time=20.275 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=75 ttl=128 time=10.170 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=76 ttl=128 time=1000.241 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=77 ttl=128 time=999.727 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=78 ttl=128 time=980.251 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=79 ttl=128 time=970.184 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=80 ttl=128 time=960.158 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=81 ttl=128 time=950.191 ms > ... > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=172 ttl=128 time=40.162 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=173 ttl=128 time=30.231 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=174 ttl=128 time=20.129 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=175 ttl=128 time=10.177 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=176 ttl=128 time=1000.484 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=177 ttl=128 time=998.454 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=178 ttl=128 time=980.176 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=179 ttl=128 time=970.329 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=180 ttl=128 time=960.252 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=181 ttl=128 time=950.236 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=182 ttl=128 time=940.238 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=183 ttl=128 time=930.245 ms > 64 bytes from 152.136.53.1: icmp_seq=184 ttl=128 time=920.239 ms > ^C > --- 152.136.53.1 ping statistics --- > 185 packets transmitted, 182 packets received, 1% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.170/480.184/1000.484/285.083 ms > > Thanks, > > Steve > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810021657.JAA00442>