From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:14:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A3B16A56E; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C23143D6E; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:14:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FeZLT-000GDB-Om; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:14:23 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FeZLu-0005jg-97; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:14:50 +0400 To: Chuck Swiger References: <20060509004620.3a8ed7a1@serene.no-ip.org> <20060512035553.GB27663@soaustin.net> <51637568@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <44645A12.3040207@FreeBSD.org> <69557175@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060512105350.F3C91B81E@shodan.nognu.de> <05233607@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <4464A2BF.6060108@mac.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:14:50 +0400 In-Reply-To: <4464A2BF.6060108@mac.com> (Chuck Swiger's message of "Fri, 12 May 2006 10:59:11 -0400") Message-ID: <58836501@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Sergey Matveychuk Subject: Re: Do we need a few more ports reviewers/committers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:14:30 -0000 On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:59:11 -0400 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Fri, 12 May 2006 12:53:50 +0200 Frank Steinborn wrote: > > > >> If you *are* the maintainer of the port use [maintainer update], > >> otherwise you should consider sending your patch to the maintainer > >> directly or use at least [change-request]. > > > > The phrase "If you are volunteering to maintain the port, be sure to > > put [maintainer update] at the beginning of your synopsis line and set > > the ``Class'' of your PR to maintainer-update." seems to tell quite > > the opposite. > Note that this is following the context set in the previous paragraph, > which was: "If the port is unmaintained, and you are actively using > it yourself, please consider volunteering to become its maintainer." > If you wish to become the maintainer of a port that is being > maintained by nobody, aka ports@freebsd.org, using maintainer-update > makes sense. Sure. It was just my case. BTW, the PR is already committed. Thanks, sem! > If the port already has a maintainer, and you're not that person, > using update or change-request seems more appropriate, unless you have > coordinated the hand-off of maintainership already with the former > maintainer and/or portmgr@. Other people feel that you should not set > the Class to maintainer-update until after the PR which assigns the > maintainership to you has been committed. Right you are. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider