Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 05:33:28 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net> To: Juan Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@it.uc3m.es> Cc: dickey@herndon4.his.com Subject: Re: /dev/shm Message-ID: <20030707093328.GA29208@saltmine.radix.net> In-Reply-To: <200307071022.04273.jrh@it.uc3m.es> References: <3F08B199.3050409@comcast.net> <20030707002347.GC5141@aurema.com> <20030706203440.D89894@vhost101.his.com> <200307071022.04273.jrh@it.uc3m.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:22:02AM +0200, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote: > > (still waiting for FreeBSD to "complete" a sysinstall program that doesn't > > look as if it was an assignment for high-school interns). > > What's the matter with "sysinstall" ? > I very much like "sysinstall" as it is now. :) to be perfectly fair, the 5.x version of sysinstall is slightly improved from 4.x (it finally - took 5 years - does not overwrite my boot loader when requested not to). however. it still has some odd use of the state information which makes me ask (and this means it's defective) why did it do _that_ (for instance installing something _twice_ because I visited the targets menu twice). if someone set out to test it systematically, it wouldn't require the snide remarks, "well, submit patches". -- Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@radix.net> <dickey@herndon4.his.com> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030707093328.GA29208>