From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Mar 22 15:30:02 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA25350
          for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 15:30:02 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA25317;
          Sun, 22 Mar 1998 15:30:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 15:30:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199803222330.PAA25317@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: Matt Dillon <dillon@best.net>
Subject: Re: kern/5641: running processes at the IDLE priority (idprio) can crash the kernel
Reply-To: Matt Dillon <dillon@best.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR kern/5641; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Matt Dillon <dillon@best.net>
To: Studded <Studded@dal.net>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, dg@root.com
Subject: Re: kern/5641: running processes at the IDLE priority (idprio) can crash the kernel
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 15:23:09 -0800 (PST)

 :Originator states that this problem is a more general form of previous
 :problems reported (particularly 5639 where idprio is correctly
 :identified by DG as the culprit). Consider this one a candidate for
 :closure?
 :
 :Doug
 
     Yes, presuming it was fixed and we aren't talking about the root-only
     hack (where the idprio binary was made executable only by root, or
     something like that).
 
 						-Matt
 
     Matthew Dillon   Engineering, BEST Internet Communications, Inc.
 		    <dillon@best.net>
     [always include a portion of the original email in any response!]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message