From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jan 14 16:48:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from smtp02.primenet.com (smtp02.primenet.com [206.165.6.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E497914FAF for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:46:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert@usr08.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp02.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA18760; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:46:25 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr08.primenet.com(206.165.6.208) via SMTP by smtp02.primenet.com, id smtpdAAA6_aGKK; Fri Jan 14 17:46:20 2000 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA15144; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:44:48 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200001150044.RAA15144@usr08.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Anonymity, was: load spike strangeness To: chuckr@picnic.mat.net (Chuck Robey) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 00:44:48 +0000 (GMT) Cc: bsd@inbox.org (Mr. K.), leif@neland.dk (Leif Neland), freebsd@gtonet.net (FreeBSD), freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Chuck Robey" at Jan 10, 2000 02:04:22 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Don't take this post as me being back from being swamped, or that I have read any depth into the email accumulated since December 17th; I normally wait until such time as I have read _all_ my email before I begin responding. However... > You know, I can understand (even if I disagree with) the need for > anonymity in political or industrial discussions. I just can't get close > to understanding that need on the FreeBSD lists. Perhaps his true identity is Linus, and he didn't want the obvious reprisals? 8-p. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message