From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 27 18:49:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CF24E2 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 18:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edflecko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x22d.google.com (mail-qc0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3876649 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 18:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id c11so3625643qcv.18 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 11:49:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2Mh+5dg7mw+cLrdNsSKNOMag+fLHTd2oe/pMsbw9bGI=; b=OnDDHekhuhU24KpCs1AMALouImvjLyOoxx9i6lGPUfagommN9ZsdrEchA9zG9C53cP QkRWRZO1X4GlQCwAoRtMg666nTMGPoLFLctr+OJeO5/PqXVhwfUhqt1rGzPT++xYiv+X QCaYnY7FufGsPyLH1/Qvhy0EeWltxrHYbBaR6s2MJkFuTuztqoo0Sq3QulXMqQLNamLB 3FQ41Cn7Qy8bITIHSca6JlIIO3Rv0IUYhT4PDt5QhoU8/8FmQMqqP5vPGsC8d1ipJr2v rT0/rhbAs/sCzK9mvUp5IbNdH6Khq26eXwi7BQmKeNrLt5ZBaMVJF0MdpyQl6420LV5G UI9w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.68.10 with SMTP id t10mr19240638qai.24.1369680555558; Mon, 27 May 2013 11:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.121.232 with HTTP; Mon, 27 May 2013 11:49:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A3A2FD.4000304@FreeBSD.org> References: <51A3A2FD.4000304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 11:49:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg_version says my ports need to be updated? From: Ed Flecko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 18:49:17 -0000 Thank you both! Since I want to know the "correct" way (or one of I'm sure many correct ways) of initially installing the OS and then getting it up to date (and staying up to date), can you tell me what I did wrong and/or what I might want to do differently? Ed On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 27/05/2013 19:00, Ed Flecko wrote: > > Clearly, I'm doing something wrong. > > > > :-) > > > > I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date, but > > pkg_version seems to disagree. > > > > I'm running 9.1 and I've installed ports, src, and docs as part of my > > install. After that, I use subversion to (I thought) make sure everything > > was up to date. > > > > I ran these commands: > > > > /usr/local/bin/svn up /usr/src > > > > /usr/local/bin/svn up /usr/ports > > > > /usr/local/bin/svn up /usr/doc > > > > and then I ran: > > > > > > pkg_version -vIL = > > > > > > > > and it says "< needs updating (index has ...) on about 1 dozen items. So > my > > "index" is out of sync with my ports??? > > > > What did I screw up and how do I correct it? > > You seem to have updated the ports tree, which is a collection of > recipes for how to build ported software, but not actually updated by > rebuilding any of the ported software that has become out of date. > > Try installing ports-mgmt/portmaster and then running > > portmaster -a > > Cheers, > > Matthew > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > > >