From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 31 10:28:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229BB16A401 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:28:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ACB13C4A3 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4652083; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:05:17 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02A82081; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:05:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A47A6B815; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:05:17 +0100 (CET) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Pascal Hofstee References: <45C04593.2090704@gmail.com> <20070131085206.GW892@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <45C06167.60401@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:05:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <45C06167.60401@gmail.com> (Pascal Hofstee's message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:29:11 +0100") Message-ID: <86odofjyua.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a question regarding X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:28:46 -0000 Pascal Hofstee writes: > Any additional sugestions/objections are always greatly appreciated. On 32-bit platforms (i386, powerpc), int is a 32-bit signed integer while size_t is a 32-bit unsigned integer. On 64-bit platforms (amd64, sparc64 etc), int is a 32-bit signed integer while size_t is a 64-bit unsigned integer. In both cases, changing this structure member from int to size_t will break the ABI. This doesn't mean you shouldn't do it, just that it should be done with care. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no