From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 19 04:22:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F43916A4CE for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 04:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E545243D55 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 04:22:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (cf9eddb1ef211a48472858aa0546a323@adsl-67-115-73-128.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.73.128])i3JBMqh7021664; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 06:22:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EF58E528F0; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 04:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 04:21:21 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kay Lehmann Message-ID: <20040419112121.GB36634@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <40839F6F.40302@vianavirtual.com> <4083AE6F.802@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+g7M9IMkV8truYOl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4083AE6F.802@web.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Guilherme Oliveira Subject: Re: 'portsdb -Uu' (make index) error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:22:56 -0000 --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:48:15PM +0200, Kay Lehmann wrote: > I see the same error here. For me it is 5.1-current only. 4-stable and=20 > 5.2-current complete 'make index' without any problems or errormessage.= =20 > The error has been introduced with bsd.java.mk v2.0 As you could see by visiting the URL included in the error, those versions aren't supported. The java maintainers may be willing to commit a patch that works around the problem on older versions, but they're not required to do so. Kris --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAg7YxWry0BWjoQKURAlsQAJ9DuOZYVXXQVemlN9HQg+VQxyC3TACgsLB7 4UZJQSk36eCzNTqAc9yEUz4= =B5sg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl--