Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:26:30 +1000 From: Alex <mailinglist@ahhyes.net> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Cc: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: DRI not working Message-ID: <48E4CC06.1070802@ahhyes.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Noland wrote: > Ok, can you guys give this patch a try? I think the memory failures are > un-related and we probably need to try and figure that out separately. > This patch should be rejecting the second head during the probe phase, > so drm should not report *anything* about it. > > One of you said something about X also reporting both heads? If that is > true and remains so with this patch, could you send me X logs? I'll try > and get someone to look into the Intel 2d driver and see what is going > on with it. > > This patch is against -CURRENT. If I need one for STABLE, let me know > and I'll work out the difference. > > robert. > > Hi Robert, The patch did not apply cleanly. I cvsup'd my entire source tree to RELENG_7 and the patch still wouldn't apply, so had to resort to inserting the code myself (perhaps I need a patch for STABLE) * Added #include <dev/pci/pcireg.h> to drmP.h * Added the following code to drm_probe() in drm_drv.c if (pci_get_class(dev) != PCIC_DISPLAY || pci_get_subclass(dev) != PCIS_DISPLAY_VGA) return ENXIO; Kernel build is now broken, code in drm_drv.c throws undefined references to PCIC_DISPLAY Any ideas?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48E4CC06.1070802>