From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 16:41:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1366CCD4; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [204.109.59.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA7FD200; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by apnoea.adamw.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 144FF1215D1; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:41:06 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:41:05 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: svn commit: r347936 - in head: . japanese japanese/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin japanese/spamassassin mail mail/claws-mail-spamassassin mail/evolution mail/exim mail/isbg mail/mailscanner mail/mimedefang m... In-Reply-To: <9333504ab697be6785edb24b4d3cf700@shatow.net> References: <201403112149.s2BLneVw006063@svn.freebsd.org> <5320570D.5060709@FreeBSD.org> <9333504ab697be6785edb24b4d3cf700@shatow.net> Message-ID: <3596f58636da4fea6a3ef18f37f3a1f4@apnoea.adamw.org> X-Sender: adamw@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: banemail fence Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, andrej.zverev@gmail.com, Andrej Zverev , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:41:20 -0000 On 2014/03/12 12:17, Bryan Drewery wrote: > I don't understand what you are saying here. I was suggesting a > p5-Mail-Spamassassin with the libraries and a spamassassin with the > frontend. This does not require modifying anything upstream. It is > just a slave port, or sub-package once we have support for that. The > same is done in many other ports. Your logic is sound here. In this case, however, "spamassassin the binaries" is really not separable from "spamassassin the Perl modules," as the binaries are simply wrappers for the Perl modules. # Adam --- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org