From owner-freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 16 00:12:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8C116A4CE for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:12:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.linux-mips.net (p508B7628.dip.t-dialin.net [80.139.118.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F7E43D5E for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:12:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ralf@linux-mips.org) Received: from fluff.linux-mips.net (fluff.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-mips.net (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5G0B8EQ018486; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 02:11:08 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by fluff.linux-mips.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5G0B7rs018485; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 02:11:07 +0200 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 02:11:07 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Philippe St-Jacques Message-ID: <20040616001107.GA15817@linux-mips.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SGI - Origin 2000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:12:57 -0000 On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:39:52PM +0000, Philippe St-Jacques wrote: > Hi. I will have soon 2 SGI Origin 2000 racks in here and I'd really like to > be informed about how well your work is progressing on those machines. Each > rack has 16 R10000 processors clocked at 250 mhz each, with 4 gig ram. In addition to the issues raised by Juli there also is the lack [1] of ccNUMA support in FreeBSD. The SN0 architecture has a very low local to remote memory latency ratio which tends to paper over the lack of such OS support pretty well. Also OS ccNUMA support comes at a cost at not too much possible gain for a 4 processor system. So scaling to 4 processors is not so much of an issue - it'll work more or less. Starting from 8 processors things are getting a bit ugly for most workloads we did test and even more so at 16. Don't get me started about scalability to a midsize system of like 128 processors without well tuned NUMA support ;-) Ralf [1] Forgive if that has changed - I'm not following FreeBSD development very much ...