From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 15 14:46:52 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2736416A420
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:46:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net)
Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (smtp.thilelli.net [213.41.129.161])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C1643D60
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:46:48 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523F9564A8;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 98056-08; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88D8564A7;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 192.168.1.20 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel)
	by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:45 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <63374.192.168.1.20.1140014805.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060215142844.GA471@Grumpy.DynDNS.org>
References: <7e148fb90602142045v71cc7c06p7054210693c03653@mail.gmail.com>
	<56635.192.168.1.20.1139988139.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net>
	<20060215142844.GA471@Grumpy.DynDNS.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:45 +0100 (CET)
From: "Julien Gabel" <jpeg@thilelli.net>
To: "David Kelly" <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at thilelli.net
Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Jimmie James <jimmiejaz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Odd daily run output.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jpeg@thilelli.net
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:46:52 -0000

>>> Filesystem  1K-blocks     Used    Avail Capacity  Mounted on
>>> /dev/ad0s1e    253678    -1358   234742    -1%    /tmp
>>>
>>> I know there's 8% reserved for softupdates, but how is it possible
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Not for soft updates, but generally for root to be able to work in case
>> of a problem, i think.

>>> that there's _extra_ space on /tmp ?  What am I missing?  This is the
>>> first time I've seen this.

>> Run fsck(8) on this file system must solve this.

> Yes, there is 8% (tunable) reserved for root on filesystems. Root has
> used 1% of that on /tmp. Its not an fsck problem at all.

Certainly it is.  Search the questions@ and stable@ archives for similar
problem reports and answers.

-- 
-jpeg.