From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jul 11 16:09:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C472ADA3811 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from offshore.bengrimm.net (offshore.bengrimm.net [84.22.108.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "offshore.bengrimm.net", Issuer "offshore.bengrimm.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755D17914B for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) X-H2O-MailScanner-Watermark: 1500393912.55531@/LO/VkTW2IpsABCdPk6ixA X-Offshore-MailScanner-From: dutchdaemon@freebsd.org X-Offshore-MailScanner-SpamCheck: notspam (whitelisted), spamassassin (notcached, score=-1, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00) X-Offshore-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Offshore-MailScanner-ID: v6BG54Lx080032 X-Offshore-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information Received: from [10.190.10.116] (D57C4972.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.124.73.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by offshore.bengrimm.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v6BG54Lx080032 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:05:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 offshore.bengrimm.net v6BG54Lx080032 X-Authentication-Warning: offshore.bengrimm.net: Host D57C4972.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.124.73.114] claimed to be [10.190.10.116] Subject: Re: firefox is pretty useless ... To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator Organization: The FreeBSD Forums Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:04:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uDapnQLv4NPORhtUJHxuh6JXAEI8g2kO5" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (offshore.bengrimm.net [84.22.108.242]); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:05:05 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:09:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --uDapnQLv4NPORhtUJHxuh6JXAEI8g2kO5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TAkCxVHu7xqOA3dTbp85VlcqQk2A05aNO"; protected-headers="v1" From: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: firefox is pretty useless ... References: In-Reply-To: --TAkCxVHu7xqOA3dTbp85VlcqQk2A05aNO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: nl On 5-7-2017 08:07, DTD wrote: > if you use xfce. By definition it is not a problem that: > > 1) install a new copy of FreeBSD 10.3 > 2) pkg install xorg > 3) pkg install xfce > 4) pkg install firefox > > installs a firefox package that does not run. The project seems to do > a bit > better than this on Windows, but they (I think) have to in that > environment. The > official answer to the above is: > > --- Comment #1 from Jan Beich --- > Partial upgrades i.e., mixing dependencies from different svn > checkouts, dates > of "pkg install" or locking dependencies, are not supported. firefox wi= ll > refuse to build unless you upgrade sqlite3. Some version requirement ar= e > specified in the port's Makefile > > $ fgrep sqlite www/firefox/Makefile > sqlite3>=3D3.17.0:databases/sqlite3 \ > ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}sqlite3>0:databases/py-sqlite3= \ > > "pkg upgrade" may help you resolve this. > > The only problem with this 'solution' is that upgrading sqlite requires= a > cascading series of updates that breaks parts of xfce. Other than that = no > problem here. So if you use twm firefox is your browser. > > The next time I build a system I will try installing firefox first. I > got here because I wanted to ungrade thunar (xfce's file manager). > That upgrade broke > the version of firefox that was running (47.somethine). Chasing and > fixing that chain eventually required a reinstall. Happily (for me) > chrome works. Might this be 10.3-specific? I'm running Firefox 54.0.1_1,1 on xorg-server 1.18.4_3,1 and xfce 4.12_1, on 11.0-REL-p9 amd64. No problems. Built on Poudriere, but I ran the same stuff from the offical repo for a while as well. --TAkCxVHu7xqOA3dTbp85VlcqQk2A05aNO-- --uDapnQLv4NPORhtUJHxuh6JXAEI8g2kO5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZZPcuAAoJEA9a9BMWOKcxgtUH/2NSLl6oCllNyj5YfUnWcxvN zzPaOIxiLyQoxr5gJLMn49/rMlp/QXCciuZoOUXoem5Lb4j1ifm2/7H13k+Hzf55 8RZuyxQAjlvkuz3yqKTljTd7EZIJYcUNpvUwPrXInBxlz7fOf7sNctilutDV3jQI RWwjATqCXf54mJ3jLuRTMu+qiI94W4moy0JgrvCbTGz/XW3o78Cyfikz0KPa4qPa 9nRs0SUWJ29JaoGGroeqGQXAkR2HuJzOHTkNd3jgizmeZ9TYFO6kGHdBMssAKFM3 Uiqj/DJC7Q0aGJYrXSp+m0iZPTr/fovzBrWX3oPfnt3lMhiBfaerbO0pJ+JQtvo= =pcIq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uDapnQLv4NPORhtUJHxuh6JXAEI8g2kO5--