From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Mar 24 21:31:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D3C26B4A3 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:31:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48n4FP2X9cz4XBR; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBE95C0224; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:23:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap36 ([10.202.2.86]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:23:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=langille.org; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=iPVGC6dspOuBtWQOba9icHK7YUBWRuw Z8uUQK2GrmFs=; b=MWV6NhmYurDBOQb42nNdp2ZzFEN2mctWrhLYmlni5NsE+2f yuuHOQmyCtOPcano7lG3wunnxR7T1ld0JkmCxBqNkTnoAGHP4QWXLGcgwkZSSrG0 8eO+F2YLcGZSu5qF5Wsfrx26mfPbrCRSFhiQt+Z4SAZ8Be4D0MJTGwScCLI8DDiN qisuXXXbysuOgH0InwdcTVyzEwfThUT5aW6Cf5qIZFn8kkRLgbFoNFRRt/4pyIm8 yGICwJs5l++MJzUlwzshHCC7+Ukcx8f773sjDH2znyU4EyGpY6wZkFxyVjbgclTl rS+tNYVqzypG+w0GM707uKJ0a2WVXpqvQ/1HOHg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=iPVGC6 dspOuBtWQOba9icHK7YUBWRuwZ8uUQK2GrmFs=; b=AeYcWgER5Ez1+Q0ujx9FzC FvWAAbebPup6+nxs/FPP4/XGs8qMY2xIlWFWtMmPkDQs0d4K/JJHiTzm24XSgd49 VK6/S1Gej9g8ZZaiIP3mMNnp8QLvXWUbw96XI1hzIXGb7DZDAA7jS6w25NjYSRKf CTv30V9JaBk3rw188L2xgy4mXE9QRoE/KbXm0TsRxIUQ52RAOFfRFGR15Lvjkj2J 9u78xh2OcxLZbXUYs8EdK5KTHxU1Vgm4ucuB8KskDXKSbpeiJA9RoNLWCkr1qsLA sxBSU2SLFZx9OosqORWpxWbLoXiRM3lGRA3qLIoUX/x7Xmhq44PeUtHaZ9bgT44g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudehuddguddujecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfffgr nhcunfgrnhhgihhllhgvfdcuoegurghnsehlrghnghhilhhlvgdrohhrgheqnecuffhomh grihhnpehimhhguhhrrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrnheslhgrnhhgihhllhgvrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 550E61880062; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:23:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-1021-g152deaf-fmstable-20200319v1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <8141b371-5cdf-4f82-8959-5fa1071aa6dd@www.fastmail.com> References: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D6568B90935EC@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200322.214355.415142200.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20200322230339.GB5808@in-addr.com> <8141b371-5cdf-4f82-8959-5fa1071aa6dd@www.fastmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:23:13 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" To: "Gary Palmer" Cc: sthaug , "Pieper, Jeffrey E" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48n4FP2X9cz4XBR X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=langille.org header.s=fm3 header.b=MWV6NhmY; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=AeYcWgER; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=langille.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dan@langille.org designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dan@langille.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.58 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[langille.org:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.27]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[imgur.com.multi.uribl.com,messagingengine.com.multi.uribl.com,langille.org.multi.uribl.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DBL_FAIL(0.00)[query timed out]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[langille.org:+,messagingengine.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[langille.org,none]; ZRD_FAIL(0.00)[query timed out]; IP_SCORE(-3.49)[ip: (-9.84), ipnet: 66.111.4.0/24(-4.89), asn: 11403(-2.69), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[27.4.111.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:31:53 -0000 On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:24 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Gary Palmer wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:11:20PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 4:43 PM, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > > > > > Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns me > > > > > when the optic is installed: > > > > > > > > > > Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (R) Network Connections are quality tested using Intel (R) Ethernet Optics. Using untested modules is not supported and may cause unstable operation or damage to the module or the adapter. Intel Corporation is not responsible for any harm caused by using untested modules. > > > > > > > > > > I cannot use an SFP+ optic at the switch. The connection just does not happen. > > > > > > > > > > If I go back to the original SFP optic, the connection occurs, as expected at 1G. > > > > > > > > > > On the switch side, I've tried a known good optic from an existing connection. > > > > > > > > > > I could install an PRO/10GbE instead, that has a built-in transceiver. I have > > > > > two of those in use now, both working on 10G. > > > > > > > > Have you tried connected it to something other than the Unifi switch? > > > > > > The only SFP+ capable switches I have are Unifi. > > > > > > I just tried the other switch (US-48) which had one SFP+ port free. Same issues there. > > > > Did the Unifi switch see the SFP+ optics on the switch end? > > That port never lit up on the switch. I didn't check anything else, > switch-related. I just inserted a 10G transceiver into port 8. It shows up as a 10GBase-SR Screen shots at https://imgur.com/a/SSEgyxN At the same time, on the server side, ifconfig indicates: status: no carrier supported media: media autoselect media 10Gbase-SR nd6 options=23 plugged: SFP/SFP+/SFP28 10G Base-SR (LC) vendor: AVAGO PN: AFBR-703SDZ SN: AD0946A00YB DATE: 2009-11-10 module temperature: 36.75 C Voltage: 3.32 Volts RX: 0.67 mW (-1.72 dBm) TX: 0.56 mW (-2.46 dBm) I have not yet tried moving from auto-negotiate on both ends. -- Dan Langille dan@langille.org