Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:25:53 +0000 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what actually uses xdr_mem.c? Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.1.20030327021835.01e005c8@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0303260803200.21019-100000@pilchuck.reedmedi a.net> References: <20030326140204.GC33671@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:18 26/03/2003 -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: >On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > Have a look at Colin Percival's binary updates stuff. He believes he > > has overcome these issues. > >I will look at it closer. (But I was told off-list that it didn't. >Nevertheless, it would be nice to find a way to automate this.) To clarify: I'm not sure if my code worked properly here. It certainly hasn't missed any files, but it might have introduced false positives -- I was surprised by the number of files it identified as having changed. I'm currently looking at this in more detail to determine if in fact these are false positives. Colin Percival PS. Can I convince anyone to look at ports/50202?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.2.1.1.20030327021835.01e005c8>