From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 12 01:06:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D07E16A407 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6F043D58 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:06:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066171A4D88; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5A3B55128A; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:05:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:05:58 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Stephanie Message-ID: <20061012010558.GA27445@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061011225348.GA16838@everest.sosdg.org> <20061011232316.GA2751@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <452D9305.5060901@sosdg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <452D9305.5060901@sosdg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wine still unusable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:06:01 -0000 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:57:41PM -0400, Stephanie wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: >=20 > >Perhaps, you should take up the challenge and port wine to=20 > >amd64. You've had over a year to study the problem. > > > >=20 > > >=20 > I appreciate your overconfidence in my abilities, but if it were within= =20 > my technical capabilities to fix, it would have been and patches would=20 > have been submitted. >=20 > Since its not, I'm still waiting on anyone that possesses the level of=20 > knowledge required to fix the problem to actually do so. Don't hold your breath ;-) Kris --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFLZT2Wry0BWjoQKURAkOiAKDG28Vocot5zeYvfVD56egua9Aj6ACdG2u+ 2xjLuGxEwHjfPEtRTbGe6ZE= =m1VY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--