From nobody Sun Sep 1 13:15:05 2024 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WxXRs4RlRz5VCCx for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WxXRs3Qf5z4H1w for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 13:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1725196505; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dkD5Suu8sx7r9se+bQsoVRg3dVyWnVexB4PCFNN8aAzSYigOJ/TKPs85597Xli0ZlF/JAJ ZPfjSbYIGnUCNZS5Wv0/raRnosGGrGZqXKFMPIZc418qRDNOfnZUFzerUFZ64q2WXGiVsR 95HhIUOizH6sA9bJE5dycCEnKrkMr0LN6T3ZQBq4Wpdqn+U9v1+ZHkPtd7quBVu6Fg5cvs jZ+LbuWsjAMK3aCIZfKTneadES6d/mme9QmMi/vtXOhJsCcrLJJo6LkdWfPktrlO0p1w1u XUVXL+CdMuIn26rlNePOwJT0q4sFi3OHCGsquqQu4phuYJKYQa6FycdbtDNfNQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725196505; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/skzgc6KzCcbx+OUvUeNTWHzEyRlkirbOR+/Q4cThlo=; b=CP/ne08PexahY+z52g00XTzrrLJv1J7xDgTxcW9TbZTCo408P7f/91CXQwCpHBourUTPNo T9nmlQdDs4A+QUVfvkKLBPc4Dh0/zkBG1IpDI7DND0bnQTDkHcFtKQ/4OUsuNX3hLMAf0/ RE6Fk73g911UM7eU/BkHeus1xMVJhJoah7QV29zc5k7pff6jMdP20LCZrq4CMHCJ8fIAi9 Q4BGtjmStjEqci/g/hXKvXCsePfAe1MKcxBIx/xmgymEMuGX22Bwjgdqao4v9EQoVsuZNT FJ6lUfYURoICFBVv8ea/Ie6I3OozwkzRn2oSpbUEsq9z3I14W7BAuMlFXj7juQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WxXRs2wSNzW3n for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 13:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 481DF5RC081609 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 13:15:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 481DF5mE081608 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 13:15:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 281166] net-p2p/namecoin: unblacklist Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:15:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: milios@ccsys.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D281166 --- Comment #3 from Chad Jacob Milios --- (In reply to Daniel Engberg from comment #2) A bona fide update is truly on its way. This version is good in production = and its worth committing this port update separately. The recent versions throughout this past year actually have in my opinion b= een rather sketchy of reliability and somewhat questionable of security. I considered submitting -devel port(s) but opted it wasnt worth more clutter = what with this already being a trio with its slave ports. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=