From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 20:26:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F1030D; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D305223C; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc27-cmbg15-2-0-cust235.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [86.27.188.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r86KQ95D073827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:26:10 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r255321 - in head: contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Driver gnu/lib gnu/usr.bin/cc share/mk sys/sys tools/build/options From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <522A3A28.4060408@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 21:26:00 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <201309062008.r86K836C048843@svn.freebsd.org> <522A36FF.6050209@freebsd.org> <05156062-6577-458F-AACF-5EA649092ACA@FreeBSD.org> <522A3A28.4060408@freebsd.org> To: Nathan Whitehorn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 20:26:12 -0000 On 6 Sep 2013, at 21:25, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > Thanks! I ran into one other issue with the patch: c++filt continues to > be built, but will be removed by make delete-old, which I guess is not > intentional. Hmm, no that's not intentional. Why is make delete-old deleting it? David