From owner-freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Wed Nov 11 16:34:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D32A2C375 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF1E1538 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tABGY0uH055887 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:34:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 200992] proccess won't die in thread_suspend_switch Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:33:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: threads X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: swills@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:34:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200992 --- Comment #17 from Steve Wills --- (In reply to johans from comment #15) The delay may be partially my fault, as I hadn't responded to the request for feedback regarding the patch solving my original issue. I hadn't experienced the issue very frequently (not nearly as frequently as you) so even though I had been running my system with the patch for a while, I wasn't confident it had been resolved. That said, it has been a while now and I haven't seen the issue. Given how it has solved the issue for you as well, we should definitely look at getting it committed and merged, and perhaps an errata issued. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.