From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 14 22:04:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4446516A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:04:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E8C43D2F for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B0CBA71 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:04:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38898-09 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:04:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from janus.daycos.com (outbound.daycos.com [204.26.70.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23450BA69 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:04:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:04:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <26075.1089753893@critter.freebsd.dk> <200407141441.23158.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_X3a9AkguK18QFel"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407141704.07142.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: CVSUP and 5.2.1 RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:04:13 -0000 --Boundary-02=_X3a9AkguK18QFel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 2004-07-14 04:14 pm, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Certainly. Let's say the people in one jail are running a special package > which depends on certain versions of various utilities or library > versions. And people in a different jail are running a different package > which has a different set of dependencies. Bingo. These jails must be > built with different snapshots of the userland. Is running a userspace that doesn't match the loaded kernel a supported=20 configuration, defined as "one not likely to bite you in the butt"? Even if someone wants that setup, surely it's inadvisable for someone to=20 build a jail that's running a newer version of the OS then the host=20 environment, isn't it? And wouldn't that be the only reason you'd ever do= =20 "make world DESTDIR=3D/foo" instead of: # make buildworld ... appropriate intermediate steps # make installworld # make installworld DESTDIR=3D/foo I don't want to be argumentative, so please don't take it that way. I'm=20 genuinely interested in the subject and want to know how other people are=20 maintaining their systems. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --Boundary-02=_X3a9AkguK18QFel Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBA9a3X5sRg+Y0CpvERAmlPAKCYY+M0AWVygU9T4QhJCoUVybtLQQCfTu0R Hi7UjrAJT6WHtT7wKNyUDeg= =jLJ2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_X3a9AkguK18QFel--