From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 01:15:13 2004 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012EE16A4CE for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:15:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF36643D1F for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:15:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB787A401; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <412550A0.4090805@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:15:12 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030516 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <XFMail.20040819175739.jdp@polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040819175739.jdp@polstra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>, <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>, <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:15:13 -0000 John Polstra wrote: >I dropped scottl and re from the cc list, since they're busy and asked >us to work it out on our own. > >On 20-Aug-2004 Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>Ok so what is the next number that should be used? >>it's currently #define __FreeBSD_version 600000 >> >>600001? >> >> > >Yes, that would be the next number. I question whether >__FreeBSD_version needs to be bumped at all, though, since the >change is already reflected in NG_VERSION and NG_ABI_VERSION. Any >port that uses netgraph would be compiled against the header files >on the system, so I can't see how it would be useful to change >__FreeBSD_version for this. (Not that I feel very strongly about it.) > I sort of agree.. We protect ourselves.. we needn't bump the FreeBSD version I don't think.. If you have a good reason for it I'll do it but I don't think it is required.. No port will be compiled with different options because of this.. I mean 5.3 and 6.0 will already have a netgraph recompile required.. > > > >>here's a cut-n-paste version.. for comment.. >>it's ready to commit. >> >> > >Thanks for taking this on. I haven't tested it, but it looks good. >Just one nit: "align" is misspelled as "allign" in the UPDATING entry. > >John >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >