From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 27 08:35:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E0016A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:35:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A990943D5D for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:35:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=roam.psg.com) by rip.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DQi1J-000HCZ-Eg; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:35:45 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=roam.psg.com.psg.com) by roam.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DQi1G-0002jR-Es; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:35:42 -1000 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17007.20189.955737.794871@roam.psg.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:35:41 -1000 To: Kris Kennaway References: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com> <20050426185144.GA25420@xor.obsecurity.org> cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: ule+preempt? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:35:46 -0000 > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:15:56AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: >> having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some months. >> i am wondering if the waters have become relatively safe to go >> to ule with preemption? > No, it can cause panics and is not yet reliable in my testing. i think i'll stay superstitious. it's bleedin' edgy enough around here already, as i run production machines on -current (yes, i know). randy