From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Jan 14 15:33:24 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9979214FDB; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:33:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au)
Received: (from avalon@localhost)
	by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA23101;
	Sat, 15 Jan 2000 10:33:19 +1100 (EST)
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Message-Id: <200001142333.KAA23101@cairo.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: We need to do an audit of our "crypto", both current and planned.
To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 10:33:19 +1100 (Australia/NSW)
Cc: markm@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <95546.947784235@zippy.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 13, 2000 09:23:55 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Jordon, have you actually sought out professional legal advice on this
course of action ?  The reason I ask is there seems to be more than one
way to interpret this new law, with some saying all you need to do is
send them a pointer to ftp://ftp.freebsd.org and you've done your work,
as opposed to identifying each package individually.

Darren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message