Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 12:46:21 +0930 From: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, gahr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r317333 - in head/audio/hydrogen: . files Message-ID: <51887205.3080300@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <201305061337.r46DbDB7006029@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201305061337.r46DbDB7006029@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/05/2013 23:07, Cy Schubert wrote: > Can you please look at PR/177806 and either approve/disapprove the patch in > it. If you want my opinion, I prefer to use development ports for anything > that is not GA. IMO it's always a good idea to leave base ports as stable > as possible. Either way, it's your decision. I am currently looking at 0.9.6-beta3 starting with this patch. While it compiles fine with gcc I'll add some patches to compile with clang before committing. I'm also changing the master site to github which is where development happens now. Initially I didn't consider using the beta for the port which is why I fixed 0.9.5 to keep the port alive. Considering that beta2 was released 11 months ago I'm leaning towards following beta releases for this port. I'm guessing Pietro Cerutti has been using beta2 for a while without any real issues? I'll test it a bit over the next few days and add an update, it may as well be added to this pr.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51887205.3080300>