Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:19:50 -0500 From: Dan <dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Centralized DB of "system" users Message-ID: <20081212181950.GB17546@ourbrains.org> In-Reply-To: <20081212141156.E4001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <139b44430812112348k5c51072ie771913c982f7cfe@mail.gmail.com> <49422A05.6050907@gmail.com> <ghtdp3$g0r$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081212120557.V3687@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <9bbcef730812120426t3c4b8a28q337c8379cd947702@mail.gmail.com> <20081212141156.E4001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar(wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)@2008.12.12 14:12:45 +0100: >>>> this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first >>> >>> why it is "right" solution? >> >> Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X. > > so not "right" but interoperable. if i do have only unix systems in LAN, > NIS is much better easier and faster. No, it really is right if you want to authenticate email, radius, etc off of LDAP. NIS doesn't do that. > > for windows-only LAN with unix server, simply using samba is OK. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081212181950.GB17546>