From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 18 00:46:51 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA09668 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:46:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from onyx.southwind.net (root@onyx.southwind.net [204.95.83.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA09663 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:46:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from Ucomplet@localhost) by onyx.southwind.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with UUCP id CAA27453 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 02:30:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from complete.org (complete.org [127.0.0.1]) by complete.org (8.7.2/8.7.2) with SMTP id AAA01644 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:42:25 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199603180642.AAA01644@complete.org> X-Authentication-Warning: complete.org: Host complete.org [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling PGP on 2.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Mar 1996 21:32:50 PST." <01I2GK0XV24I00IZH8@HOOVER.STANFORD.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:42:22 -0600 From: John Goerzen Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I would suggest getting the PGP 2.6.3 International version and compiling it for the USA. It includes FreeBSD makefile options and compiled fine for me. > The PGP port compiles on my 2.1 system (from the cdrom), either using a > previously downloaded distribution from MIT or letting it go out and FTP > from somewhere. > > But when I run the program and try to decrypt an encrypted file, I get > an error message saying: > > Error: Nested data has unexpected format. CTB=0x75 > > The number following CTB varies depending on the file encrypted. > > I also tried compiling it without the port, which produces complaints > about conflicting types for 'lseek' in zipup.c:43 and types.h:84. I > temporarily changed types.h by commenting out the lines referring to > lseek (and again by changing int to long in two places), and the > program then compiles but produces the same error. > > I am wondering whether anyone has successfully compiled this on 2.1, > and if so how. > > My solution was to compile it on my 2.0.5 system at the office, where, > using the port, it produced a properly working binary. This binary > differed in only one character from the binary that doesn't work. > > Annelise > -- John Goerzen, programmer and owner | Freedom..liberty..justice..democracy| Communications Centre, Goessel, KS | ..limits on free spech on the Net...| Main e-mail: jgoerzen@complete.org | Which one doesn't belong? |