From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Aug 10 22:52:36 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA12839
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 22:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.15.68.22])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA12834
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 22:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA03860;
	Tue, 11 Aug 1998 15:51:53 +1000
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 15:51:53 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199808110551.PAA03860@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: archer@lucky.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG, luoqi@watermarkgroup.com
Subject: Re: New softupdates code panics
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>> The same here. My system paniced two times for some 4 hours after
>> I've booted kernel with Kirk's patches. The system was not very
>> busy, just ordinary mail/news reception (it is home computer).
>> 
>Change the expression ``newparent ? newparent : doingdirectory'' in Kirk's
>patch to ``doingdirectory && newparent ? newparent : doingdirectory''.
>(for file ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c)

Um, this expression is equivalent to ``doingdirectory'', which is the
same as the unpatched expression.  General fuzzy reasoning suggests that
the expression should be ``doingdirectory && !newparent''.

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message