From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Jul 18 08:17:18 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D33103E0F0; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:17:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E611F8E9B5; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:17:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ffhe7-0006Fm-Jt; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:17:15 +0200 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:17:15 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r474820 - in head/graphics: . diff-pdf Message-ID: <20180718081715.GZ967@fc.opsec.eu> References: <201807171752.w6HHqPGY086343@repo.freebsd.org> <20180717205936.vknaxlrewnjv5rsc@atuin.in.mat.cc> <98365d7c-b252-f0b6-77ee-fe7e37474e33@freebsd.org> <20180718072531.kauobgwo5xidvv5j@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20180718075950.GY967@fc.opsec.eu> <20180718080825.pfvoiusov34egc7w@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180718080825.pfvoiusov34egc7w@atuin.in.mat.cc> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:17:18 -0000 Hi! > I did not say it was a bad idea to update the submitted port. I said it > was a bad idea to do it without asking the submitter first. I disagree: Waiting for submitter response on minor changes does slow down or even stall the intended action. Yes, it might educate the submitter, but at the expense of committer patience. If we have better tools to estimate the submitter response time/quality, that might change, but until then, it's better to ask for foregiveness than to ask for permission. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 2 years to go !