From owner-freebsd-emulation  Wed Aug 28 09:56:46 1996
Return-Path: owner-emulation
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA13299
          for emulation-outgoing; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 09:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eeyore.lv-hrc.nevada.edu (eeyore.lv-hrc.nevada.edu [131.216.27.16])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA13292
          for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 09:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scooby.lv-hrc.nevada.edu (scooby.lv-hrc.nevada.edu [131.216.27.8]) by eeyore.lv-hrc.nevada.edu (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id JAA04977 for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 09:56:22 -0700
Message-ID: <32247A91.500E@hrc.nevada.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 09:57:53 -0700
From: Harry Reed <doon@eeyore.lv-hrc.nevada.edu>
Reply-To: doon@eeyore.lv-hrc.nevada.edu
Organization: UNLV/HRC
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Is VME going to be considered with the DOS emulator?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,
	With all of the renewed talk about the DOS emulator I was wondering if
the Pentium (tm) Virtual Mode Extensions (VME) were/are going to be
used? They seem to make vm86() much easier!


Harry Reed
doon@hrc.nevada.edu