From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jun 21 13:42:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bsd.cityscope.net (bsd.cityscope.net [209.16.49.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DF637B809 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 13:42:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bahwi@bsd.cityscope.net) Received: from localhost (bahwi@localhost) by bsd.cityscope.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA74725 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:45:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bahwi@bsd.cityscope.net) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:45:30 -0500 (CDT) From: bahwi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Large memory differences between 2.2.8-stable and 4.0-stable Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We have two servers, one is 2.2.8 and the other is 4.0, and the memory differences between the two are astounding. Example: getty is 180K/820K (Size/Res) on 2.2.8 getty is 904K/296K (Size/Res) on 4.0 That one looks like it may simply be reversed, but that is what it says. Top is much larger though, even reversed. top is 632K/868K (Size/Res) on 2.2.8 top is 1848K/1028K (Size/Res) on 4.0 cron is 332K/448K (Size/Res) on 2.2.8 cron is 932K/460K (Size/Res) on 4.0 Is this a bug, have we done something wrong, or is 4.0 more of a memory hog? The performance is alot better but memory is needed on these servers. Any help is appreciated, please reply directly to this address, as I am not subscribed to this list, thanks in advance. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message