From owner-freebsd-net  Thu Sep 19 22: 0:56 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2323237B401
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp [202.249.10.124])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CC043E3B
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp)
Received: from localhost (kame201.kame.net [203.178.141.201])
	by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id g8K50Jt60406;
	Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:00:20 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:00:46 +0900
Message-ID: <y7vy99xgsqp.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
To: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
Cc: Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@it.uc3m.es>,
	Lista <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	"(Lista) bind9-users@isc.org" <bind9-users@isc.org>
Subject: Re: RES_INSECURE and CHECK_SRVR_ADDR in resolver functions (IPv6
 anycast response problem) 
In-Reply-To: <200209192259.g8JMxsB5065119@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <3D898E6B.692C3C43@it.uc3m.es>
	 <200209192259.g8JMxsB5065119@drugs.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.6.1 (Upside Down) Emacs/21.2 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 15
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>>>>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:59:54 +1000, 
>>>>> Mark_Andrews@isc.org said:

> 	IPv6 anycast addresses are a joke as they are currently
> 	defined.  Don't bother with them until there behaviour
> 	gets redefined by the IETF.

(I'm just asking,) what is the "joke" part of the current definition?
The restriction that an anycast address must not be used as a packet's
source address?

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message