Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 00:24:29 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays? Message-ID: <20111103002429.GA66126@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4EB1476A.3070204@digsys.bg> References: <B888842A-7DB4-491B-93E3-A376745019F5@sarenet.es> <20111102131311.GA56941@icarus.home.lan> <4EB1476A.3070204@digsys.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed Nov 2 11, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > > > On 02.11.11 15:13, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:57:33PM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote: > >>Today I?ve come across an issue long ago forgotten :) Running out of > >>i-nodes. > >[...] > > > >There's a reason /usr on FreeBSD defaults to "all the remaining space on > >the disk" if you pick the defaults/auto. Surprise. :-) > > > >The summarised version is: > > > >1. You have control over this yourself: newfs(8) -i flag. You can even > >input this flag during sysinstall when building a new system. > > > >[...] > > Just for the completeness of it, one would use ZFS and be done with this > issue. :-) 'boot -s && fsck_ufs -r /dev/ufs/whatever' might also be helpful. cheers. alex > > That would be point 0. in my personal list of suggestions. All the rest > would be "if you have good reason to not use ZFS". > > Daniel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111103002429.GA66126>