From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Dec 8 22:52:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595DD14A0D for ; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 22:52:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA24898 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 07:52:46 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id HAA26797 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 07:52:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za (zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za [146.64.24.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11BC151E9; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 22:52:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhay@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za) Received: (from jhay@localhost) by zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA95501; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:51:38 +0200 (SAT) (envelope-from jhay) From: John Hay Message-Id: <199912090651.IAA95501@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 3rd patch] In-Reply-To: <19991206195341.B11220@daemon.ninth-circle.org> from Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai at "Dec 6, 1999 07:53:41 pm" To: asmodai@wxs.nl (Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:51:38 +0200 (SAT) Cc: shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp (Yoshinobu Inoue), freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> All patches succeeded on a fresh CURRENT source tree except for: > >> > >> - sbin/ifconfig/Makefile > >> - sbin/route/Makefile > >> - usr.bin/netstat/Makefile > >> > >> no .rej file was made curiously enough. Patched by hand. > > > >Was your fix uncommenting > > > >#CFLAGS+=-DINET6 > > No, as Peter Wemm was kind enough to explain to me, I forgot to use -p > and -I flags. > > >Then, I intentionally commented them out by default, because > >INET6 kernel config option is also not enabled by default. > > Well, a make world shouldn't be dying from lack of specifying INET6. I > wonder how to best tackle this problem. I mean, we want IPv6 support to > be there when we want it, and not there when we don't. Ideas of how to > solve this small kludge are welcome. > My suggestion would be to always enable IPv6 support in the userlevel programs. Then you only need to compile a kernel with INET6 to have a working IPv6 machine. The same is done with IPX. Ifconfig, netstat and those programs are always compiled with IPX support even if you don't have IPX in the kernel. John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@mikom.csir.co.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message