From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 18 02:59:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA18300 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 18 May 1998 02:59:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA18292 for ; Mon, 18 May 1998 02:59:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA18967; Mon, 18 May 1998 09:59:39 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA17373; Mon, 18 May 1998 11:59:38 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980518115938.07526@follo.net> Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 11:59:38 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Atipa Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOTICE: Softupdates References: <199805180301.UAA00444@rah.star-gate.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Atipa on Sun, May 17, 1998 at 08:41:26PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, May 17, 1998 at 08:41:26PM -0600, Atipa wrote: > > Has this been worth the effort? :) > > In other words, how much faster is it than standard mounts, and how much > faster is it than "async,noatime" mounts? > > Although in practice it is still a bit shakey, is it theoretically more > stable (in life and in unexpected death...) than async mounts? It is theoretically as stable as normal mounts, in life and in death. This is much much more stable than async. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message