From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Apr 13 07:40:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE958D3B270 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB6F1CB for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v3D7emoE018709 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:40:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 212149] security/strongswan: Build with libressl 2.4 causes runtime failure: Undefined symbol "CMS_RecipientInfo_ktri_get0_signer_id" Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:40:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: franco@opnsense.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:40:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212149 --- Comment #10 from Franco Fichtner --- (In reply to dewayne from comment #9) Looks like it. Still the best option. I tried to ask LibreSSL if we could have an optional workaround for targeted builds as pinning the OpenSSL version in general is tricky. For 2.4.x it w= orks well, but 2.5.x was just released so I don't know where that will lead. http://marc.info/?l=3Dlibressl&m=3D147816235401460&w=3D2 No more responses or incentives there as well. Eventually, strongSwan need= s to be made aware of how feature macros or libressl version numbers are used to achieve the same. I think that's something we need to do and push upstream ourselves. Cheers, Franco --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=