From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 14 16:41:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3B3181 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 16:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1759189C for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 16:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ey16so2109041wid.16 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3wcwjr9msRs6YGKQ0QfQUC9AqZVmS8DVOhrHLk2Z+IM=; b=dEENtoAIvMyNqYN8kK8sDQ4qD+u3NxlMVuoSAFBXtGbQC6DhMTGxm+spmngGIAM+Qg nguweZtMa5lc5wP/XAACjjvLRiuNujuOFFNd7at5m7uZ2526CwSMfei2ZXVPeikkWBE2 BoHT09GXKDNVOqDW7HRFHQ2NSNJ+0f764F1d6/hFmhrOZUIkGZcqSKOSPUr818xYUPMp Im27uHjfaRXXg1665gMW2cEE+x8F7HxiLqM68urt+ADFimy9eW7AI0EpE4oYVF24EbPA 4GxF6zI/5uKbNPtsg4CFKxo7GJeddZy6EkeMEIwpDc4LRJpftJLKHNA1AA+Bu6hunF6e b0Mg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.37.133 with SMTP id y5mr6606899wij.30.1373820064746; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.94.132 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:41:04 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pmBYmMgM2m0N79A_VOJziyQL0qQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is ATH_ENABLE_11N supposed to work on 9-stable? From: Adrian Chadd To: Thomas Zander Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 16:41:06 -0000 Nope. It's a -10 thing. -adrian On 14 July 2013 08:01, Thomas Zander wrote: > Hi, > > from the mailing lists I couldn't figure out whether 11n is supposed > to work on stable since the existing mail threads seem to focus on > current exclusively. > > And since the option exists in the stable kernel code as well, albeit > neither in GENERIC nor in NOTES, I thought I could give it a try > anyway. > > I had some partial success. Test in station mode, WPA2 associated > properly, light traffic (browsing the web) seems to work okay as well. > However as soon as I try to really push some data through it, e.g. > rsync large files, the card drops all network traffic until I > disassociate and re-associate with the access point again (e.g. netif > restart). > > If 11N is just not ready in -stable yet, it's not a problem, but if > it's supposed to work, I'd begin to collect debugging information. > > So, is it supposed to work on a 9-stable as of today? > > Best regards > Riggs > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"