From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Sep 30 17:29:34 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA07521
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 17:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA07471
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 17:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA00510; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 17:29:01 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199610010029.RAA00510@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: isdn code
To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 17:29:01 -3100 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <9041.844108890@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Sep 30, 96 08:41:30 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >> Unless sufficient many people come out in defense of the current isdn
> >> code in the FreeBSD tree, it will be removed because of lack of support
> >> from developers.
> >
> >What is "unsupported" about it such that it makes you want to remove
> >the code?
> 
> Well, nobody seems to use it or support it.

I thought many Germans were using it, since their country has a real
communications infrastructure, unlike ours.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.