From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Apr 23 15:37: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pyros.yi.org (dialin29.mediawizards.net [209.63.39.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E720B37B8EF; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 15:36:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mmuir@es.co.nz) Received: from es.co.nz (pyros.lan [192.168.100.1]) by pyros.yi.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A183B; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 15:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <39037B26.33C1B62F@es.co.nz> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 22:37:26 +0000 From: Mike Muir Reply-To: mmuir@es.co.nz X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nate Williams , Poul-Henning Kamp , Matthew Dillon , "Rodney W. Grimes" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday References: <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com> <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk> <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com> <39035629.BC369DD4@es.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Muir wrote: > > Nate Williams wrote: > > > I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable > > branch (yet). That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that > > happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release. > > That would kinda make sense since cvsuping with tag=RELENG_3 seems to > give me FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (#0: Sat Apr 22 20:59:03 PDT 2000).. Ok wait im a moron.. been using the stable-supfile instead of the 4.x-stable-supfile.. hmmmmm. mike. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message