From nobody Mon Oct 10 13:02:05 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MmJwL545Lz4fNM4 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MmJwK3yW4z3txv for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (65-100-43-2.dia.static.qwest.net [65.100.43.2]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 408F938D0D; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.26.25.100] (ivy.pas.ds.pilgrimaccounting.com [10.26.25.100]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C938E17261; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 06:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: pkg upgrade vs building from source To: paul beard Cc: FreeBSD-questions References: <8ffd94e3-6113-c364-e95e-1e855c7b8440@bluerosetech.com> <9715f0aa-2ad7-70c1-1482-6f56ad5e3bf7@bluerosetech.com> From: Mel Pilgrim Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 06:02:05 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4MmJwK3yW4z3txv X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 2607:f740:c::4ae as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.995]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:c::/48, country:US]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2022-10-09 14:10, paul beard wrote: > The origin is the same for all three pkgs.  pkg info will show the > flavour.  If you need cyrus support enabled, install the postfix-sasl > pkg and see if you still get the error. > > It's the plain flavor. > > I don't see a -sasl variant…? You wouldn't. Flavours don't have separate origins. > If you are referring to the make config dialog, no cyrus/sasl support > was added, just using the built-in dovecot support. The error messages in your original message come from enabling SASL in the smtp client without building with cyrus-sasl support. Since, per your original message, that error went away when you switched from the public repo pkg back to your port build, that suggests the ports version has cyrus-sasl included. > no cyrus/sasl support was added, just using the built-in dovecot support. It's possible the postfix build process pulls in cyrus-sasl support if it's installed on the system at build time even when the port has SASL=off. With the working build installed, what are the outputs of the following commands: $ pkg options postfix $ postconf -A