Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:42:00 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Latest round of bsd.*.mk changes Message-ID: <20040204084200.GA19129@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1075883393.76993.63.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <1075871381.76993.21.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200402041012.01057.andy@athame.co.uk> <1075883393.76993.63.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:29:54AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Perhaps we need something like USE_GETTEXT_BUILD similar to > USE_PERL5_BUILD. Whatever is the choice, please submit a PR so we can > track this. Thanks. Is that really necessary? i.e. does it buy a significant improvement over using the explicit BUILD_DEPENDS in the relative few ports that use it? I'm becoming concerned at the proliferation of variables being added to b.p.m - the trend towards macro'izing every conceivable shell command used by ports is another one I'm uncomfortable with (why?). Kris --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAILBXWry0BWjoQKURAr4oAKCp3XPn58zQ6+uqxgt/Qtj2hc5uIgCgpcnW tSIKwzasS7fRQuK0Q2/YT9A= =9KJw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040204084200.GA19129>